How does one begin to describe
this article? How about, "smug, prissy, self-important, vapid, illogical, pretentious, condescending, reactionary, and sniggeringly stupid?" Ah, better yet, let's just imagine what Churchill or FDR would have said in response to it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7473d/7473dda4e61644a6c28158b443135c7220f8d9b9" alt=""
SEMI-RELATED HIGH-HORSE UPDATE: Seems poor Danny Radcliffe just can't catch a break,
can he?
3 comments:
How old is the author? Six???
The tone and reasoning of it reminds me of something a second grader would write.
You're kinder to it than I, RB. ;-)
Alas, link was broken. What was it?
Am shaking head over Equus thing, though. The line between Real People and Fictional People grows ever thinner, it appears :P
Post a Comment