Derrida on the book between two covers as a solid object enclosing an authority is, as Derrida must know, complete bullshit: nobody believes that a book is an object; it's a focus of verbal energy. What he should be attacking is the dogmatic formulation that eliminates its own opposite: that's the symbol or metaphor that can kill a man, and has killed thousands. It's always self-enclosed and opaque; no kerygma ever gets through it.Intriguing, but I doubt very few would think so poetically, or alternately scientifically, about a book. But Frye sounds very much like De Man here, though certainly without De Man's sometimes implied and sometimes explicit fear.
13 May 2007
Some Frye With That
An accidental (re-)discovery, from the Northrop Frye notebooks, circa 1991:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(209)
-
▼
May
(30)
- A Little Zozo Mojo
- It's Offensive To Everyone
- Two Verbal Prose Arrangements
- For Crying Out Loud
- Because Symbolism's For Sissies
- Upsetdate
- Drowning By Numbers
- Today's Mantra
- Forgetting Us Perfectly
- All Her Pretty Follies Flung Aside
- It's Al In The Game
- A Man Of Good Will
- Somehow, You Can't Imagine The Church of England B...
- All's Well That Ends Fa---
- Some Frye With That
- New Rules
- Reminder of a Literate President
- A Yard Day's Light
- A Mangled Web
- A Comment On Now, And A Memory From Then
- Roughing It On The Bush
- The Very Simple Life
- But In North York, It'd Be Given Tenure
- Because This Blog Doesn't Do Happy Dances
- I'll Have What He's Having, or Melts In You...
- It Also Applies To Jerry Falwell
- Being There
- Okay, Now This Is Genuinely Sad
- The Play's The Thing
- Paging Helen Lovejoy
-
▼
May
(30)
No comments:
Post a Comment