How does one begin to describe this article? How about, "smug, prissy, self-important, vapid, illogical, pretentious, condescending, reactionary, and sniggeringly stupid?" Ah, better yet, let's just imagine what Churchill or FDR would have said in response to it.
SEMI-RELATED HIGH-HORSE UPDATE: Seems poor Danny Radcliffe just can't catch a break, can he?
24 February 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(209)
-
▼
February
(35)
- WWJD? If he were a scary freakin' clown that is...
- The L-Word
- It'll Be A Tragedy! (Unless It Happens During A D...
- Woman In A Lampshade
- Ashes and Asses
- Back To That Same Old Place
- One Flu Over?
- When playing chicken goes horribly wrong
- Whatever you can muster
- Keys To The Gates
- Because A Little Pee Makes All The Difference
- Winning The Lovely Bugger Outright
- Anything Else?
- Whory Shearer
- So There IS An Advantage To The New Blogger
- Just One Book
- Medieval Tech Support
- There's A Tarantino Movie In There
- Feinting With Damned Praise
- Stop and Buy Goods (On a Snowy Afternoon)
- lub-dub, lub-dub
- It's All About Dixon Boys
- Fox News
- Let there be dancing in the streets, drinking in t...
- A New Development; Mark Your Calendars!
- Libretto By Sir Mix-A-Lot
- With A Parricidal Toe
- The Dragon In Winter
- Legislators Gone Wild
- Feared Science
- Once More Unto The Well
- Surely He Can't Be Serious
- Gloomy Tuesday
- Contractually Obligatory Friday Entry, or Fakes, F...
- Chats Nod Nod
-
▼
February
(35)
3 comments:
How old is the author? Six???
The tone and reasoning of it reminds me of something a second grader would write.
You're kinder to it than I, RB. ;-)
Alas, link was broken. What was it?
Am shaking head over Equus thing, though. The line between Real People and Fictional People grows ever thinner, it appears :P
Post a Comment