Derrida on the book between two covers as a solid object enclosing an authority is, as Derrida must know, complete bullshit: nobody believes that a book is an object; it's a focus of verbal energy. What he should be attacking is the dogmatic formulation that eliminates its own opposite: that's the symbol or metaphor that can kill a man, and has killed thousands. It's always self-enclosed and opaque; no kerygma ever gets through it.Intriguing, but I doubt very few would think so poetically, or alternately scientifically, about a book. But Frye sounds very much like De Man here, though certainly without De Man's sometimes implied and sometimes explicit fear.
13 May 2007
Some Frye With That
An accidental (re-)discovery, from the Northrop Frye notebooks, circa 1991:
No comments:
Post a Comment